Why the most important internet law is being rewritten

  वेळा पाहिला 72,800

The Verge

2 महिन्यांपूर्वी

US lawmakers want to change Section 230, a pivotal moderation clause that’s often called the internet’s most important law. But critics say that changing Section 230 could cause more problems than it solves.
Learn more: bit.ly/3uZ0RVw
Subscribe: goo.gl/G5RXGs
Like The Verge on Facebook: goo.gl/2P1aGc
Follow on Twitter: goo.gl/XTWX61
Follow on Instagram: goo.gl/7ZeLvX
The Vergecast Podcast: pod.link/430333725
More about our podcasts: www.theverge.com/podcasts
Read More: www.theverge.com
Community guidelines: bit.ly/2D0hlAv
Wallpapers from The Verge: bit.ly/2xQXYJr
Subscribe to Verge Science on MRpost, a new home base for our explorations into the future of science: bit.ly/2FqJZMl

टिप्पण्या
The Verge
The Verge 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
How do you think the internet could be improved?
Albert Jackinson
Albert Jackinson महिन्यापूर्वी
I think one of THE biggest issues is dealing with misinformation. I don't know what legislation could be enacted to mitigate or fix the issue, but that's my input.
JayJ_The_ CreekerMan
JayJ_The_ CreekerMan 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Eliminate internet and force people to rediscover life and become human again technology social media and internet has ruined the world time to reset life before it's to late 😁
Him
Him 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Corey Malachi uwu
Liam O'Donnell
Liam O'Donnell 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Get rid of Facebook, reduce the data collection and generally improve the privacy and security for everyone.
The Brawl Boys
The Brawl Boys 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Idk, but not by having a puppet of a president. Along with media not being controlled to say "orange man bad" and to have trump removed from office cause they brainwashed the people in the middle of the road to be dem.
Bryan Pacheco
Bryan Pacheco महिन्यापूर्वी
Well, the social media ONLY censors right wing people. We all know this, and I'm a centrist
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper महिन्यापूर्वी
Klobuchar: Look at these huge potatoes they sent me, this is the real problem! Amy, why are you complaining? if anything getting bigger potatoes is a good thing. Especially if you paid the same price as normal potatoes.
Edpo Veronez
Edpo Veronez महिन्यापूर्वी
This report is very biased. Why not diversify the interviewees? why do they always choose people who only reinforce their opinion? Why, instead of reporting the criticisms from the point of view of the presenter, do not call on people who are injured by the Legislation to speak for themselves? The impression that remains is that they do not want to seriously debate the issue.
Crypto.addict
Crypto.addict महिन्यापूर्वी
the most important aspect for me is the privacy, for example it's very common now to upload your files and data on the internet. Personally I do it in descentralized cloud storages such as Internxt Drive because I know they are secure and they respect my privacy but there are plenty of others that don't do it and people should be aware of it
Sean Gelarden
Sean Gelarden महिन्यापूर्वी
So basically you have a pipe spewing raw sewage on everyone so you go to the source and they tell you they just own the pipe and if you make them take responsibility their model doesn't work so go talk to the people flushing their toilets, regulating a business is not violating the first ammendment
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt महिन्यापूर्वी
If the government forces a private entity to host and associate with speech they don't want that would violate the 1st amendment. The government can't compel someone to express a certain view.
Gold Formation
Gold Formation 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
😜
Richard Ciotti
Richard Ciotti 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Nicely done overall, a bit overly simplistic and you failed to mention the bigger issue with social media. The C word, censorship, the fact that the largest tech companies are been engaging in editing and suppressing content based on whether or not it aligns with their political views, not “in good faith” as specified in section 230. Big tech’s abuse of this alone should pierce the veil of protection that 230 gives.I agree that 230 was written without knowledge of where the Internet and social media was headed. It was written in order to give early content providers and the Internet room to grow and expand organically without being overwhelmed with litigation. Well it worked and now big tech has grown into a cancer. A cancer that has metastasize and now reaches into almost every aspect of our lives. Section 230 should be thrown out and completely rewritten. That along with the repeal of the Smith Mundt act of 2012 would be a good start in fixing these rapidly growing problems.
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
You're assuming that "good faith" means without any type of bias in regard to viewpoint, but that's not how it's ever been interpreted. I could make a forum specifically for conservatives and ban anyone with a liberal viewpoint and I'd still have section 230 protections.
Ellen March
Ellen March 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Excuse me, but when a POPULAR magazine, with ZERO stated credentials, starts an article with "what conservatives got wrong" about a complex LEGAL issue and history, lumping together a vast army of lawyers and politicians with more knowledge and experience in their respective little fingers into a single flimsy stereotype, WHO DO THEY THINK TAKES THEM SERIOUSLY. Bueller? Bueller?? PLEASE tell me I'm not the only one...
Papose
Papose 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The brace
Rudy M
Rudy M 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Imagine censoring a current sitting president 🤡 clowns
Rudy M
Rudy M 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
We need an internet with freedom of speech for EVERYONE
Metacognition88
Metacognition88 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Thanks Verge. This was some great nutritious information
Fran
Fran 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Mundane
Aaron Schram
Aaron Schram 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The problem is that there is only one side that is providing the definitions of what is considered "problematic content"... For example, right now someone hearing, reading, seeing something they don't agree with can be considered "harassment"... Who gets to define "harm"? who gets to define "hate speech"?
Jeremy H
Jeremy H 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I don't think section 230 should be modified. I don't think government should tell a company what to do. With that said the predatory EULA and contracts between companies should be reviewed as there are significant issues.
TheAstronomyDude
TheAstronomyDude 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
If I host a site on a boat in the middle of the Atlantic which country's laws do I need to follow?
Elvin deSouza
Elvin deSouza 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
If you're paying for hosting, then the country the web service is based in. If not then the guys who regulate the domain suffix(.com etc) can deplatform you. Also there's an organization that regulates every dns entry or something, that's how they make it difficult for people to visit terrorist groups' websites
Theelysium
Theelysium 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Censoring people is not fixing some thing. Just cause you don’t like others opinions doesn’t mean you get to stop them from talking.
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
You can if they're talking on the website that you made.
diego jimendz
diego jimendz 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Where is my 2600 fast mhz boy
Ben X
Ben X 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Do not touch the freaking internet!! One of the best inventions of our time, destroyed by lawmakers that do not understand it on any technical capacity...
m4tt3m50n
m4tt3m50n 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
This is US centric. Section 230 is irrelevant to me in the UK. What needs to happen is the same internet laws across the board.
Tech4now
Tech4now 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
How do you do this and keep accounts anonymous?
Armoterra
Armoterra 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I think you misrepresented the point of conservatives. They’re not against platforms deleting posts or suspending accounts; they’re against them doing so selectively, and in a biased manner. Their argument is that if they pick and choose which voices get promoted based on their own political biases, then they’re a publishing company and not a platform.
Frankie L
Frankie L 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
But section 230 does not care whether you’re a publisher or platform. It’s about third party users vs not third party users.
Armoterra
Armoterra 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Steve Wonderbelt Again, whether the stance is valid or not is not my point.
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Armoterra It seems like there really isn't a consistent stance on this from either side. Conservatives seem to have different opinions on what the issue is and how to fix it, as do Liberals. Many conservative politicians have introduced legislation that would penalize platforms for moderating anything at all while others don't have an issue with moderation they just want it to be more "fair" while still others don't care about moderation they just think these platforms are breaking anti-trust laws.
Armoterra
Armoterra 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Steve Wonderbelt Yes, but their viewpoint is that those biases would be evenly spread if it were a fair system. If you had both conservative and liberal employees, without discriminating against the conservatives, you probably wouldn’t have that problem (you’d have biases, but not over-represented on one side, and outstanding situations can be handled on a case-by-case basis). However, the point is that there is significant evidence for company-wide policies to incorporate such biases that favour viewpoints of the political Left. Reasonable persons with politically Right viewpoints will be banned for expressing their opinion when extremist, harmful persons go unnoticed simply because they favour the political Left. That’s the position of conservatives, that if you elevate one viewpoint and suppress the other, then you’re no longer a “public forum.” It’s not at all that “they don’t get it” as this video portrays. You can agree or disagree with them, that’s another topic, but if you’re going to represent their viewpoint, do so accurately. All that this video showed is that the Verge doesn’t get it.
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Every moderation decision is done in a somewhat biased manner though, just because humans are doing the moderating. We can't help but be biased it's just how our brains work. So every platform moderates in a biased way.
Mark Hancock
Mark Hancock 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Several years ago I created a FB Group for News and Info for a town I lived in. Now it is Huge. My intend was to run it as an lightly moderated group with a simple set of rules. I have never had a complaint from FB but last year I decide to turn on moderation during the election to try to keep things non-political. Next thing I knew, I got a message from FB that content had been removed from the Group and since it was Moderated, if it happened again they would remove the Group. What a surprise, I quickly disabled Moderation for the Group.
Yash Nagda
Yash Nagda 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
If there are laws made like constitution and what is wrong and what is not and their is independent department which governs it. It could be possible that hate speech, violence promoting speeches can be regulated.
Preśident Donald J. Trump
Preśident Donald J. Trump 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Reform it so I can be back!
David Cazares
David Cazares 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
How's it like having a gimmick account impersonating a shamed president? I'm genuinely interested
adudeisthebomb
adudeisthebomb 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
This is the best video the verge has made in a while
Mike Bates
Mike Bates 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Props to Adi for being at The Verge for so long now & working on so much hard-hitting journalism. Thank you Adi!
Tim
Tim 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Better idea, how about monopoly busting. We had to do this in the past when oil, Ma Bell etc got so big, they were using their size to smash competition. Also, let's not take Google, Facebook etc. word on what's good for us. They are in the business of making money and will use any way they can to destroy competition. BREAK them up and let competition in. These big international companies will always have a reason why we should not touch them, and will use all their resources to convince us they are right.
**
** 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
This is the verge right? Can you guys let me actually not accept cookies on your site thanks
naijapikins
naijapikins 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Who makes the rules for the rest of the world?
naijapikins
naijapikins 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
A single section for the whole internet meant to guide the same people who require a whole 27 amendments to navigate life albeit imperfect? interesting.
SanFranFan30
SanFranFan30 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
What's up with that clip with the potato?
horia jm
horia jm 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
nicely done video
The Rodestarr
The Rodestarr 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Why does Cruz say anything at all ? As an African, I’m completely baffled as to how that dude is allowed to do anything.
Scott Jacobs
Scott Jacobs 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I want a story on the Potato!
It's ya boi Raid Shadow Legends
It's ya boi Raid Shadow Legends 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The truth these days is labeled as misinformation on social media platforms. These platforms censor and ban one side and let the other side call for genocide and spread actual mis information on their counter parts
KM
KM 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
MSM publishes lies all the time, why should FB, Twitter and Google not get the same protection? 😂😂😂😂
alenn mosses
alenn mosses 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
When a single rule serves multiple purpose, its basically a two edged sword.
Julius Smith
Julius Smith 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Every Internet post should include the digital signature of its author, so that reposting cannot (legally) anonymize the content - social media can easily implement this
Yatharth Ipsum
Yatharth Ipsum 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
*American Internet
Black Tiger
Black Tiger 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Some people MUST BE silenced.
Daniel Rios
Daniel Rios 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Are we going to ignore that Amy Klobucar has been getting potatoes the size of her head?
Raphy Martinez
Raphy Martinez 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I don’t want anything taken down. I’d rather know who is a racist or a crazy person or whatever they are. Just because you don’t allow someone to post something, doesn’t mean they no longer exist. It doesn’t make the problem go away, just keeps me from knowing that the problem exists.
Revatron Prime
Revatron Prime 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I agree 👍
El Tostado
El Tostado 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Improve privacy before anything. We know they won’t because that’s how’s these tech giants make their money.
Elvin deSouza
Elvin deSouza 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Jean Kumik we have to establish a threshold. Personally, if I search for something on MRpost and it shows related ads, and those ads follow me to the MRpost mainpage,I don't mind. But when I search Google for stuff and it shows an effect in recommendations and ads, it feels like a huge breach of privacy. I don't mind certain types of data collection(good faith data collection), but others might be offended by the same
FortNite KID
FortNite KID 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Jean Kumik Rightly said
Jean Kumik
Jean Kumik 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
As we're all watching this on a free ad supported platform. Option B is to pay for internet services and have it break into the insanity of Netflix/Hulu/Disney+/HBOGo/CuriosityStream/Nebula/etc
Jerry Shen
Jerry Shen 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
its also how you and me enjoy services like email serivce providers for free
Kamil Kozyra
Kamil Kozyra 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Extremely insightful - thanks! :)
vrancras
vrancras 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Just stop making laws for everything.
Ryukachoo
Ryukachoo 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
2:12 Oh, he's back from Cancun?
David Cazares
David Cazares 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I do not like that man Ted Cruz
Lonely
Lonely 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
lmao ted cruz is a joke
WaQbwyAYt5hm HDuQx1lS
WaQbwyAYt5hm HDuQx1lS 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
They want to go back to the 90s where all the information is controlled. They allowed people to talk and share information freely and they almost got a Hitler so now they want to put the genie back in the bottle.
OX MONSTER
OX MONSTER 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Censorship and control from the corrupt governments
Ben Greenwald
Ben Greenwald 22 दिवसांपूर्वी
MAGAT. Get educated.
raw2029
raw2029 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
That's not the right question,it should be "why do governments interfere ?"
El Tostado
El Tostado 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
We need some type of regulation or else these giants media companies can go on without being checked in any way.
Tyler
Tyler 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
What do you mean by interfere? The government is ever present in our lives from the day we're born.
Dustin Parker
Dustin Parker 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Maybe we wouldn't have such an issue if we would stop using terms like hate speech that have no laws attached to them and have no definition. Hate speech is being leveraged to enforce whatever rule is needed in the moment and has no meaningful value other than "you hurt my feelings". You can't enforce everyone's feelings.
Henry Cullen
Henry Cullen 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Maybe congress should stop outsourcing crime fighting to big tech and tackle it themselves
Jensen Raylight
Jensen Raylight 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
*Summary:* let's kill the messenger instead of finding & punishing the true criminal
Techbasics
Techbasics 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Politicians are very scared of internet in this polarized world, India has started it and polarized leaders across the world will gather together to curb freedom of any form that doesn't meet there ideology
walspeed
walspeed 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
TL:DR, Conservatives want to get rid of Section 230 altogether thinking it means they will be able to say whatever they want but in reality; it will likely have the opposite effect of sites being much faster to censor people promoting lies and hate speech since the site can be held liable. Democrats want to change the law to make it to where sites that do little to police misinformation can be held liable for the misinformation they spread such as Facebook and Twitter doing little to stop the spread of voting misinformation from the 2020 election, allowing the events to happen that led up to the Capitol riot. There's also the concern that repealing section 230, is purely a political move so that whoever is in power can control social media and the one thing preventing either side from doing it, is section 230.
Nishith Joshi
Nishith Joshi 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
So glad that India just went ahead and gave social media platforms 36 hrs to remove a post. If not then social media become liable for the content of the Post.
AsHalt
AsHalt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
well at least it's not china...
Sweet_Roll
Sweet_Roll 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I like the intention of making internet a better place, but the internet is not just facebook and twitter. These boomers don't know enough about the internet.
awannagannaful
awannagannaful 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Guaranteed this law will be changed not to get Facebook et al in trouble, but to enact harsh censorship of all dissenting thought and platforms, in most cases it will be small outlets to suffer.
jake liu
jake liu 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
230 should be removed, Social media become online censorship like China even worst.
Jack
Jack 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@walspeed they can make a law that mandates free speech on the internet
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@jake liu If they were liable for everything users post I guarantee you couldn't have even made this comment, or at least it would take a very very long time for it to be posted. MRpost would have to manually review it first because it would be the same as them saying it.
jake liu
jake liu 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
That is fine, they already doing that.
walspeed
walspeed 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
You do realize, if 230 is removed, sites will be liable for what their users say, meaning they will likely censor their sites even more since they are liable for what their users say or do.
Dus
Dus 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
look everyone its the Verge a top tech company defending 230 how unexpected 😂
Tyler
Tyler 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
They're a media company, and they're already liable for the things they publish. I also don't think this video showed clear-cut support.
Jacob Kummer
Jacob Kummer 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
If anything they would be against it. They are not a social media website like Facebook or Twitter or MRpost, which is what this video is posted on...
Gustavo Matias
Gustavo Matias 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The rule 34 is being rewritten?
senna welsh
senna welsh 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Yorman Ortiz you lived in a cave or what ?
Gustavo Matias
Gustavo Matias 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Deathrobloxian Ikr? its sad they changed the title
Deathrobloxian
Deathrobloxian 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Wonder how many people in the future replies won't get it.
Govind Goyal
Govind Goyal 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Yorman Ortiz do u even know what rule 34 is 😂
Yorman Ortiz
Yorman Ortiz 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
No rule 230 is
jaffar1234
jaffar1234 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
It's funny, Trump is calling for the law to be repealed, But in fact the law should have been repealed due to Twitter and Facebook not taking action against Trump's transgressions for years
Shrek Wazowski
Shrek Wazowski 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Ahhh we ARE getting close to Cyberpunk universe
•Niks•Great
•Niks•Great 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Social media is the fakest way to get social. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Rip eng
jkelleyrtp
jkelleyrtp 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
This was actually a really good job, kudos.
Ehsan Kia
Ehsan Kia 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
There's so much misinformation and misunderstanding all over the internet about 230, thankfully the verge is one of the rare places that understand what the hell it's about.
Errhka
Errhka 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The problem is that if you repeal this law, there is a likelihood that the internet will become more censored than ever before, as platforms will not want to be liable with anything questionable posted on their website (with blanket bans of certain content being more likely). If everyone is ok with this - fine, but I fear it is the most likely outcome even though it's an unintended one.
Jongsun Suh
Jongsun Suh 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Jinkeez1 Abolishing 230 would *favor* the entrenched big platforms, by making it more difficult for smaller alternatives to compete or even just operate. The video discusses this.
Avengerie
Avengerie 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
It is a good thing, because companies going into overdrive cracking down on "unwanted speech" will: a) harm their profits b) create tens of millions of forced refugee users (100s of millions globally), which will make alternative platforms, payment systems and server hosts financially feasible.
Package Not Delivered
Package Not Delivered 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Jinkeez1 But then those most impacted aren't the companies but the end users.
Jinkeez1
Jinkeez1 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Tech companies have overstepped their boundaries into outright censorship and thus deserve to have 230 abolished.
Pascal Costanza
Pascal Costanza 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
It's funny how you Americans seem to assume that there is currently no censorship happening. (For example, Facebook is censoring nudity, just as an example.)
theloniousMac
theloniousMac 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Boy that word “fix” can be anything from an axe to a nuclear bomb depending on who is wielding it, and I know of precious few if any lawmakers, with the understanding of the nature, nuances, and technology of the internet necessary to “fix” it.
john pardon
john pardon 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
dang them potatoes gurl.
Liam Collins
Liam Collins 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
klob will never not be funny to me
ashskullz
ashskullz 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Rip
Luigina Trotta
Luigina Trotta 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Allow free speech. Let future generations lead the internet. Protect user privacy and security. that's it.
Tyler
Tyler 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
I like free speech too, but I'm not sure that every place is appropriate for it. If you get invited to a birthday party and run around saying the n-word, you would get kicked out. If you go to someone's facebook page and do it, I think it only makes sense that you could get kicked out of there too. Maybe the answer is to give people more control over the moderation of their pages, but full freedom of speech with no repercussions doesn't match our experience in physical life. Freedom of speech means the government can't limit your speech, not that individuals and companies can't treat you differently for it.
Phantom66Games
Phantom66Games 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Well there is always deep web
Jerry Shen
Jerry Shen 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
you mean the dark web?O.o
ziguirayou
ziguirayou 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Did I just witnessed a 8 minute rant AGAINST freedom of speech?
Steve Wonderbelt
Steve Wonderbelt 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Why is arguing against repealing section 230 ranting against freedom of speech?
An Audioslave
An Audioslave 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Yes, yes you did. Sad how these people are so brainwashed and have zero idea how communism creeps in.
IvanRSaldias
IvanRSaldias 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Fix her potatoes!
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
face?
TempestuousD
TempestuousD 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Personally, I dont like how these rules affect us in the rest of the world
Revatron Prime
Revatron Prime 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@SR Productions yeah the US shouldn't be theory country to control the internet
Dus
Dus 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@SR Productions Internally in the US it’s being argued because people believe the US constitution should apply online. Unfortunately these platforms are now global and this could be an issue.
SR Productions
SR Productions 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Agreed..the US has too much power over other countries and is becoming monopolistic of its power
Lonely
Lonely 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
you must be living in a cave
ADee SHuPA
ADee SHuPA 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@IvanRSaldias Indonesian
MABin
MABin 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
boomers making rules about the internet.
BroAnarchy
BroAnarchy 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@analogdistortion ok boom kid hoooooo didn't see that COMING, _DID YA????_
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@theloniousMac and what's more, most of the isms and hate etc is just people trying to annoy and troll and trigger the progressive weirdos for a laugh
theloniousMac
theloniousMac 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
We made the Internet, and it was a much nicer place until after the post boomer generations came along. Oh we had our arguments on USENET, private bulletin boards, Compuserve, Genie, AOL, and others, but it wasn’t the cesspool of palpable hatred it has become. We had this tendency to pick apart ideas instead of off the cuff meaningless attacks on groups of people.
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Darth Plagus tee hee
Darth Plagus
Darth Plagus 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@analogdistortion ok boomer
Wil C-137
Wil C-137 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Every time I see Ted Cruz I throw up in my mouth
Brace110
Brace110 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Ugh let congress deal with wars and health care, leave the internet to the internet.
Katzelle3
Katzelle3 महिन्यापूर्वी
Where do you think war happens these days?
omar velasquez
omar velasquez 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Wow seeing the internet get regulated throughout the years has been so interesting, like laws being passed on it and it changing due to those laws . Also just how people that are born now will have such a different experience then I ever did or will as they grow with the internet.
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Nabil Silva Yeah so it's best to leave it alone
Nabil Silva
Nabil Silva 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@analogdistortion Any regulation would always favor big corps, since they have the most resources to spend to comply with the regulations and scale at the same time.
Elements The Producer
Elements The Producer 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Lol, I feel like we are in the 80s of the internet, like the coke wave in the 80s
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Funny how they're always in favour of the big corperations. The law I mean, but yes of course, Democrats too.
Christian Risoli
Christian Risoli 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
This is a nuanced problems and congress are far to tech illiterate to deal with them , this will not go well
Sean Kaye
Sean Kaye 20 दिवसांपूर्वी
The law was created by people who had no idea what the internet would become and no benefit of experience or hindsight. So suggesting that politicians are too "tech illiterate" to amend the law logically has to lead to the conclusion based on the history that they were too "tech illiterate" to create it in the first place. At least now, you have the benefit of hindsight and 25 years of experience.
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Darth Plagus You really assume everyone for free speech is like that or are you joking? There's a large minority of freaks that somehow would think like that ya know?
Darth Plagus
Darth Plagus 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@analogdistortion repealing 230 will strip freedoms from the little man and create an even more policed internet. All your Q and Stormfront friends will be silenced more aggressively.
analogdistortion
analogdistortion 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
So the big corperations win control against the little man once again. Thanks Democrats.
Dennis Brännvall’s #1 Fan
Dennis Brännvall’s #1 Fan 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Only 5 views in 7 minutes?
M D
M D 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
The Verge reappear in my subscription, strange problem with the algorithm of MRpost. I was sure that there over
THETRUTHofYOUTUBE
THETRUTHofYOUTUBE 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Former president obama
Српски патриота
Српски патриота 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Obama was a populist weakling,did nothing positive and bombarded middle east.
Orien Day
Orien Day 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
even when someone has stopped being the president you still call them the president
THETRUTHofYOUTUBE
THETRUTHofYOUTUBE 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
@Josh Witte FORMER best president obama
Josh Witte
Josh Witte 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
"Best President in History Obama"
Help Me Reach 10k With Subs
Help Me Reach 10k With Subs 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Congrats To" Everyone' Who is Early And who..found this 🍩.....!!
apeshit clothing
apeshit clothing 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
🍻
Zizhang Cheng
Zizhang Cheng 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Somebody need to be blocked! They deserve this.
अंशुमान मिश्र Anshúmân Mishrã
अंशुमान मिश्र Anshúmân Mishrã 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Better to be No Internet
Darius Lezama
Darius Lezama 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Never thought i would see 1 minute ago on a Verge video
Udit kaushal
Udit kaushal 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
Security should be put on the forefront then other things can be considered .
User
User 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
fun fact: nobody cares your first
BroAnarchy
BroAnarchy 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
fun fact: . . . . . . . . . . I Do.
User
User 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
fun fact: 69 people can't be first...
Vikram Prashanth
Vikram Prashanth 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
👍🏽
Martin H
Martin H 2 महिन्यांपूर्वी
First?
Section 230: The Law at the Center of the Big Tech Debate | WSJ
07:31
Wall Street Journal
वेळा पाहिला 66 ह
Who owns the boats looting the high seas?
07:19
Verge Science
वेळा पाहिला 94 ह
Vinni Unboxing His Gaming Setup.! || Sahithi || Vinni || Sekhar Studio
10:24
Sekhar Studio
वेळा पाहिला 592 ह
Neeya Naana | 9th May 2021 - Promo 1
0:36
Vijay Television
वेळा पाहिला 1.1 लाख
View from the Top: Craig Federighi
50:14
Berkeley Engineering
वेळा पाहिला 475 ह
Where Are All the Bob Ross Paintings? We Found Them.
10:50
The New York Times
वेळा पाहिला 14 लाख
Inside the mind of a master procrastinator | Tim Urban
14:04
TED
वेळा पाहिला 39 लाख
Tara Shears - Antimatter: Why the anti-world matters
59:42
The Royal Institution
वेळा पाहिला 807 ह
We used Apple Fitness Plus for two months. Here’s what you need to know
14:04
The Extreme Physics Pushing Moore’s Law to the Next Level
11:52
Seeker
वेळा पाहिला 3.9 लाख
The Rise of SpaceX Elon Musk's Engineering Masterpiece
31:15
ritm 1
वेळा पाहिला 3.3 लाख
Why this $6,400 Hasselblad is the slowest camera I’ve ever loved
09:46
The Verge
वेळा पाहिला 220 ह
Day in my Life as a Corporate Lawyer [What I REALLY Do as a Trainee]
16:54
Liam Porritt
वेळा पाहिला 83 ह
WGS17 Session: A Conversation with Elon Musk
35:50
World Government Summit
वेळा पाहिला 1.4 लाख
Vinni Unboxing His Gaming Setup.! || Sahithi || Vinni || Sekhar Studio
10:24
Sekhar Studio
वेळा पाहिला 592 ह
Neeya Naana | 9th May 2021 - Promo 1
0:36
Vijay Television
वेळा पाहिला 1.1 लाख
My First Roza and Iftaar At Home
10:57
8bit MAMBA
वेळा पाहिला 590 ह
How I fixed her phone! 😂 #shorts
0:29
Dan Rhodes
वेळा पाहिला 17 लाख
You Should Buy These Phones Under 15000/-
6:29
GADGETS ONE MALAYALAM TECH TIPS
वेळा पाहिला 24 ह